Wednesday, 2 July 2025

I HATE TO SAY I TOLD YOU SO … BUT I TOLD YOU SO

Oh, dear reader, where do we begin with this latest chapter of Britain’s political pantomime? The air is thick with the scent of regret, wafting like a poorly ventilated pie shop from the collective nostrils of the British electorate. I hate to say I told you so—truly, I do—but the evidence is as inescapable as a tax demand from HMRC. You, my dear voters, were so hell-bent on giving the Tories the boot that you failed to notice you’d invited a troupe of clowns into Number 10, led by the aptly nicknamed “Two Tier Keir” Starmer. And now, like a hungover reveller waking up next to a stranger, you’re staring at the mess and wondering how it all went so spectacularly wrong.

Let’s rewind to that fateful election, shall we? The Conservative Party, after years of presiding over Brexit chaos, Partygate shenanigans, and economic stumbles that would make a tightrope walker blush, had become the political equivalent of a stale biscuit—nobody wanted them, but nobody had a better tin to raid. Enter Labour, with Keir Starmer at the helm, a man whose charisma could be outshone by a damp dishcloth but whose promises gleamed like freshly polished silver. The electorate, in a fit of righteous fury, decided the Tories had to go. Fair enough—anger is a fine motivator, like a strong cup of tea on a dreary morning. But here’s where the plot thickens: in your zeal to eject the blue team, you didn’t bother to check the small print on the red team’s manifesto. You didn’t ask, “Who, exactly, are we voting in?” It was less a considered choice and more a blindfolded dart throw at the ballot box, and now we’re all paying the price.
 
I got tired of warning people not to vote Labour. All I saw on X was "They can’t be worse than the Tories" / "We've just got to get rid of the Tories". Hmm, how did that work out, you prophets of the bleeding obvious?! The outcome is a masterclass in self-flagellation, a wry nod to the fact that Labour’s reign has turned out to be less a shining beacon of hope and more a dimly lit corridor of disappointment. A year into Starmer’s tenure—yes, a whole year, marked by the kind of public approval ratings that would make a reality TV contestant weep—61% of Britons are dissatisfied, according to the latest Ipsos poll. That’s a net satisfaction score of -34, putting him in the ignominious company of Gordon Brown and Boris Johnson, two names that echo like the tolling of a funeral bell for political careers. And yet, here we are, surprised as if we’d bet on a three-legged blind horse with dementia and expected it to win the Derby.

The trouble, as one X poster so astutely notes, is that there’s nobody better to replace Starmer in the Labour Party. It’s a bit like realising the only alternative to a leaky roof is a tent made of tissue paper. The electorate, in its wisdom, traded one set of woes for another, all because the focus was on vengeance rather than vision. You see, the British voter has a habit of treating elections like a reality show eviction—out with the old, in with the new, no questions asked. But governments, unlike contestants on "I’m a Celebrity …" don’t come with a pre-screened script or a promise of redemption. They’re a reflection of us, and if we choose them with the intellectual rigour of a toddler picking sweets, well, we get the politicians we deserve. And let’s not kid ourselves—this isn’t the first time we’ve stumbled into this trap. 

Cast your mind back to the 1970s, when Harold Wilson’s minority government staggered under the weight of economic strife and public discontent, only to be swept away by Margaret Thatcher in 1979. The parallels are uncanny: a Labour leader struggling to inspire, a public fed up with the status quo, and a vote cast more in hope than in judgment. History, that cruellest of teachers, is whispering its lessons, but we’re too busy humming pop tunes to listen. Today’s dissatisfaction—fuelled by perceptions of “two-tier” governance, where some communities seem to get the VIP treatment while others are left with the bill—mirrors those turbulent times. A 2023 YouGov poll found 45% of respondents already felt Starmer’s Labour was playing favourites, a sentiment that’s only fermented like bad wine over the past year.

So, what’s the takeaway from this sorry saga? It’s a warning, dear electorate, etched in the sardonic ink of hindsight. A government is only as good as the people who choose it, and if that choice is made with the attention span of a goldfish and the foresight of a blindfolded archer, then don’t be surprised when the arrows land in the wrong target. The ballot box is not a toy; it’s a tool, and wielding it requires thought, not just temper. Next time—and there will be a next time, mark my words—pause before you cast your vote. Ask not just who you’re ejecting, but who you’re embracing. 

Because if you don’t, I’ll be here again, pen in hand, hating to say I told you so, while you’re left wondering why the political circus keeps pitching its tent in your backyard. In the meantime, enjoy the show. The clowns are in charge, and the popcorn’s on you.